<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 819 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298774</link>
    <description>The court directed the Official Liquidator to distribute funds based on a ratio of 55.97% for workers and 44.03% for Secured Creditors, as per the second report of the Chartered Accountant. Secured Creditors were allowed to determine distribution among themselves based on their priority claims. The court clarified the distribution of funds in the liquidation process, settling the issue between workers and Secured Creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 819 - GUJARAT  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298774</link>
      <description>The court directed the Official Liquidator to distribute funds based on a ratio of 55.97% for workers and 44.03% for Secured Creditors, as per the second report of the Chartered Accountant. Secured Creditors were allowed to determine distribution among themselves based on their priority claims. The court clarified the distribution of funds in the liquidation process, settling the issue between workers and Secured Creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>