https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298773 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, finding that the cheque in question was issued as a security deposit and not towards the discharge of any debt or liability. As a result, the court quashed the order to issue process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, stating that no criminal case was made out. The court emphasized that forcing the accused to undergo trial would constitute a misuse of the court's process. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:56:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298773 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, finding that the cheque in question was issued as a security deposit and not towards the discharge of any debt or liability. As a result, the court quashed the order to issue process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, stating that no criminal case was made out. The court emphasized that forcing the accused to undergo trial would constitute a misuse of the court's process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298773