<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 666 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld violations of Regulations 10(b), 10(k), 10(n), and 13(12) of CBLR, 2018, but did not find sufficient grounds to uphold the violation of Regulation 10(d). The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was largely upheld, emphasizing the significance of due diligence, accurate record-keeping, and proper employee supervision by Customs Brokers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 666 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld violations of Regulations 10(b), 10(k), 10(n), and 13(12) of CBLR, 2018, but did not find sufficient grounds to uphold the violation of Regulation 10(d). The appeal was rejected, and the impugned order was largely upheld, emphasizing the significance of due diligence, accurate record-keeping, and proper employee supervision by Customs Brokers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>