<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27154</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the income belonged to the Hindu undivided family and could not be taxed again in the individual&#039;s capacity. The Court emphasized that taxing authorities can consider an assessee&#039;s actions over multiple years in determining income inclusion. The Court dismissed the applications under section 256(2) as no legal questions arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, with costs assessed at Rs. 125.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27154</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the income belonged to the Hindu undivided family and could not be taxed again in the individual&#039;s capacity. The Court emphasized that taxing authorities can consider an assessee&#039;s actions over multiple years in determining income inclusion. The Court dismissed the applications under section 256(2) as no legal questions arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, with costs assessed at Rs. 125.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>