<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 657 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414876</link>
    <description>Transitional Cenvat credit was treated as available where the declared stock had already been verified pursuant to remand directions. The verification report recorded only a limited discrepancy, which was subsequently reversed by the assessee, and the procedural requirement was regarded as satisfied once the stock declaration was properly checked. Further insistence on examining all records was held unwarranted because the appellate authority had gone beyond the scope of the earlier remand. On that basis, credit could not be denied merely for procedural objections after verification of the declared stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 657 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414876</link>
      <description>Transitional Cenvat credit was treated as available where the declared stock had already been verified pursuant to remand directions. The verification report recorded only a limited discrepancy, which was subsequently reversed by the assessee, and the procedural requirement was regarded as satisfied once the stock declaration was properly checked. Further insistence on examining all records was held unwarranted because the appellate authority had gone beyond the scope of the earlier remand. On that basis, credit could not be denied merely for procedural objections after verification of the declared stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>