<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 654 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It clarified that its decision should not be construed as granting immunity from any demands under the Customs Act, 1962, for violations of notifications or provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy. Any recovery under the Customs Act would need to be considered independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 654 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It clarified that its decision should not be construed as granting immunity from any demands under the Customs Act, 1962, for violations of notifications or provisions of the Foreign Trade Policy. Any recovery under the Customs Act would need to be considered independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>