https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414869 The court dismissed the petitions seeking to quash complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that quashing should be rare and not done mechanically. It found that the account from which cheques were issued belonged to the petitioner, establishing an essential ingredient of Section 138. Allegations of misuse of blank signed cheques by the petitioner's father-in-law were deemed disputed facts requiring trial evidence. The court highlighted the importance of addressing factual defenses during trial, ultimately concluding that the case did not meet the criteria for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414869 The court dismissed the petitions seeking to quash complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, emphasizing that quashing should be rare and not done mechanically. It found that the account from which cheques were issued belonged to the petitioner, establishing an essential ingredient of Section 138. Allegations of misuse of blank signed cheques by the petitioner's father-in-law were deemed disputed facts requiring trial evidence. The court highlighted the importance of addressing factual defenses during trial, ultimately concluding that the case did not meet the criteria for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414869