<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414868</link>
    <description>The court referred the matter to a larger bench to resolve the legal inconsistencies regarding the liability of directors under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in light of the applicability of the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Further proceedings were scheduled for 29.11.2021 to address the conflicting interpretations and ensure a comprehensive adjudication of the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414868</link>
      <description>The court referred the matter to a larger bench to resolve the legal inconsistencies regarding the liability of directors under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in light of the applicability of the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Further proceedings were scheduled for 29.11.2021 to address the conflicting interpretations and ensure a comprehensive adjudication of the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>