<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2096 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment proceedings under Section 153A were invalid for the assessment year 2007-08 due to the absence of incriminating material. However, for the same year, an addition of Rs. 7.05 lakhs towards unexplained investment in the cost of property purchase was upheld. Regarding the unexplained investment in construction, the Tribunal recalculated the cost and sustained an addition of Rs. 28.01 lakhs. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax this addition in the assessment year 2012-13.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2096 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment proceedings under Section 153A were invalid for the assessment year 2007-08 due to the absence of incriminating material. However, for the same year, an addition of Rs. 7.05 lakhs towards unexplained investment in the cost of property purchase was upheld. Regarding the unexplained investment in construction, the Tribunal recalculated the cost and sustained an addition of Rs. 28.01 lakhs. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to tax this addition in the assessment year 2012-13.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>