https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298767 A letters patent appeal was treated as maintainable against a Single Judge's order in an appeal under Section 50(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that provision forms part of a limited but self-contained appellate scheme for foreign-award enforcement matters. The later Commercial Courts framework did not expressly or by necessary implication exclude the further intra-court appeal in this setting, and the statutory appeal provided by Section 50(1)(b) was preserved within that scheme. On that basis, the challenge to maintainability failed. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298767 A letters patent appeal was treated as maintainable against a Single Judge's order in an appeal under Section 50(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that provision forms part of a limited but self-contained appellate scheme for foreign-award enforcement matters. The later Commercial Courts framework did not expressly or by necessary implication exclude the further intra-court appeal in this setting, and the statutory appeal provided by Section 50(1)(b) was preserved within that scheme. On that basis, the challenge to maintainability failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298767