<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27151</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the silver utensils qualified as personal effects and were excluded from the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that personal effects need not be used daily but must be intended for personal use in the ordinary course, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s restrictive interpretation. The respondents were directed to cover the petitioner&#039;s costs incurred in the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 48 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27151</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the silver utensils qualified as personal effects and were excluded from the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The court emphasized that personal effects need not be used daily but must be intended for personal use in the ordinary course, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s restrictive interpretation. The respondents were directed to cover the petitioner&#039;s costs incurred in the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>