<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 631 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414850</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Additionally, the defective penalty notice under Section 274 invalidated the AO&#039;s jurisdiction to levy the penalty. The AO was directed to delete the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:45:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 631 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414850</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the lack of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Additionally, the defective penalty notice under Section 274 invalidated the AO&#039;s jurisdiction to levy the penalty. The AO was directed to delete the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>