<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 611 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414830</link>
    <description>In liquidation proceedings, a belated claim cannot be entertained unless the claimant shows sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal found that the claim was filed after the public announcement deadline and that the explanation of ignorance of the corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency and liquidation was not credible. As no sufficient cause was established, condonation of delay was refused, the liquidator&#039;s rejection of the claim was upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 611 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414830</link>
      <description>In liquidation proceedings, a belated claim cannot be entertained unless the claimant shows sufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal found that the claim was filed after the public announcement deadline and that the explanation of ignorance of the corporate debtor&#039;s insolvency and liquidation was not credible. As no sufficient cause was established, condonation of delay was refused, the liquidator&#039;s rejection of the claim was upheld, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>