https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414827 The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the Corporate Debtor failed to pay the assured investment returns, and the application met the threshold limit. Mr. Gaurav Katiyar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) with a moratorium under Section 14 imposed to protect the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found the application complete and free of disciplinary proceedings against the proposed IRP. en-us Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414827 The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the Corporate Debtor failed to pay the assured investment returns, and the application met the threshold limit. Mr. Gaurav Katiyar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) with a moratorium under Section 14 imposed to protect the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found the application complete and free of disciplinary proceedings against the proposed IRP. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414827