<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1364 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the addition on account of unexplained investment in house property and to allow relief for low household drawings. It emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and proper valuation methods, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:46:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1364 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the addition on account of unexplained investment in house property and to allow relief for low household drawings. It emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and proper valuation methods, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>