<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Operational Creditor&#039;s application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute regarding quality and supply issues communicated before the Demand Notice. Despite procedural issues raised by the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal primarily focused on the pre-existing dispute to dismiss the application. The Tribunal confirmed jurisdiction and the application&#039;s timely filing but emphasized that the Operational Creditor should pursue recovery through a civil suit instead. The application for CIRP initiation was ultimately rejected and disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1222 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Operational Creditor&#039;s application to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor due to the existence of a pre-existing dispute regarding quality and supply issues communicated before the Demand Notice. Despite procedural issues raised by the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal primarily focused on the pre-existing dispute to dismiss the application. The Tribunal confirmed jurisdiction and the application&#039;s timely filing but emphasized that the Operational Creditor should pursue recovery through a civil suit instead. The application for CIRP initiation was ultimately rejected and disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>