https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298728 The Tribunal dismissed the company petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for operational debt due, citing a dispute over the quality of goods supplied and lack of proper authorization in the demand notice issued by the applicant's advocate. The respondent's objections regarding the quality of goods and discrepancies in document service were considered. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, concluding the dispute rendered the petition not maintainable under the Code. The petitioner was advised to pursue other avenues to enforce its claim against the respondent. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298728 The Tribunal dismissed the company petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for operational debt due, citing a dispute over the quality of goods supplied and lack of proper authorization in the demand notice issued by the applicant's advocate. The respondent's objections regarding the quality of goods and discrepancies in document service were considered. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, concluding the dispute rendered the petition not maintainable under the Code. The petitioner was advised to pursue other avenues to enforce its claim against the respondent. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298728