https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298739 In revisional proceedings, a complainant whose application led to the summoning order and whose rights are directly affected by the impugned order is a necessary party and must be heard; non-impleadment deprives the revision of proper adversarial consideration. A superior court also cannot direct a subordinate court to allow a pending bail application on the same day, because bail must be decided through independent judicial discretion on the facts and law. The challenged direction was therefore impermissible and set aside, with the trial court left to consider any bail request independently on its merits in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:46:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298739 In revisional proceedings, a complainant whose application led to the summoning order and whose rights are directly affected by the impugned order is a necessary party and must be heard; non-impleadment deprives the revision of proper adversarial consideration. A superior court also cannot direct a subordinate court to allow a pending bail application on the same day, because bail must be decided through independent judicial discretion on the facts and law. The challenged direction was therefore impermissible and set aside, with the trial court left to consider any bail request independently on its merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298739