https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298738 Once a Magistrate has actively considered and refused cognizance against particular persons, the same matter cannot ordinarily be reopened before the Court of Session on identical material. The document explains that although Section 193 CrPC permits the Sessions Court to take cognizance after committal, cognizance is taken only once, and a fresh cognizance order is impermissible where the Magistrate has already applied his mind and rejected the request. It further states that a second application before the Sessions Court for the same relief was not maintainable when the Magistrate's refusal was not challenged in revision. en-us Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:46:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298738 Once a Magistrate has actively considered and refused cognizance against particular persons, the same matter cannot ordinarily be reopened before the Court of Session on identical material. The document explains that although Section 193 CrPC permits the Sessions Court to take cognizance after committal, cognizance is taken only once, and a fresh cognizance order is impermissible where the Magistrate has already applied his mind and rejected the request. It further states that a second application before the Sessions Court for the same relief was not maintainable when the Magistrate's refusal was not challenged in revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298738