<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 586 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414805</link>
    <description>In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter, the court noted that admitted signatures on the cheques attracted the statutory presumption of issuance for consideration and toward a legally enforceable debt. The accused&#039;s plea that the cheques were blank security cheques had to be proved by the defence. Additional appellate documents, including the account statement and the company authorisation resolution, were treated as relevant to the complainant&#039;s claim and to whether the cheque amounts were due. Because the earlier acquittal rested on an incomplete evidentiary record, the matter was remanded for fresh disposal with both sides allowed to adduce further evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 586 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414805</link>
      <description>In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act matter, the court noted that admitted signatures on the cheques attracted the statutory presumption of issuance for consideration and toward a legally enforceable debt. The accused&#039;s plea that the cheques were blank security cheques had to be proved by the defence. Additional appellate documents, including the account statement and the company authorisation resolution, were treated as relevant to the complainant&#039;s claim and to whether the cheque amounts were due. Because the earlier acquittal rested on an incomplete evidentiary record, the matter was remanded for fresh disposal with both sides allowed to adduce further evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>