<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1181 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298718</link>
    <description>In cases triable exclusively by the Court of Session, the Magistrate is not confined to a ministerial role after receiving the police report; if he disagrees with the final report, he may act on a protest petition, issue process, and summon persons shown in column 2 before committal. After committal, the Court of Session assumes original jurisdiction under Section 193 and may take cognizance of the offence, including summoning additional persons on the materials transmitted with the record, without waiting for Section 319. The contrary view that the Sessions Court must defer until evidence is recorded was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1181 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298718</link>
      <description>In cases triable exclusively by the Court of Session, the Magistrate is not confined to a ministerial role after receiving the police report; if he disagrees with the final report, he may act on a protest petition, issue process, and summon persons shown in column 2 before committal. After committal, the Court of Session assumes original jurisdiction under Section 193 and may take cognizance of the offence, including summoning additional persons on the materials transmitted with the record, without waiting for Section 319. The contrary view that the Sessions Court must defer until evidence is recorded was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>