https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414801 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to the lapse of the appeal period. The court held that the assessing officer's error in choosing the legal provision did not amount to a lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner's partial compliance with the order by paying the tax dues indicated acceptance, making it difficult to contest the order in a writ proceeding. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414801 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to the lapse of the appeal period. The court held that the assessing officer's error in choosing the legal provision did not amount to a lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner's partial compliance with the order by paying the tax dues indicated acceptance, making it difficult to contest the order in a writ proceeding. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414801