<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 565 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A to the exempt income earned, aligning with judicial precedents. The appeal on this ground was allowed. Regarding the addition on account of share premium received under Section 56(2)(viib), the Tribunal found flaws in the valuation method used by the AO and remanded the issue for re-examination in accordance with Rule 11UA. The appeal was partly allowed, with directions for a fresh evaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:52:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 565 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A to the exempt income earned, aligning with judicial precedents. The appeal on this ground was allowed. Regarding the addition on account of share premium received under Section 56(2)(viib), the Tribunal found flaws in the valuation method used by the AO and remanded the issue for re-examination in accordance with Rule 11UA. The appeal was partly allowed, with directions for a fresh evaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>