<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 564 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had discharged its burden of proof regarding the share application/premium amount, as per the Assessing Officer&#039;s remand report, and cited relevant case laws to support its decision. The judgment was delivered on October 27, 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:52:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 564 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had discharged its burden of proof regarding the share application/premium amount, as per the Assessing Officer&#039;s remand report, and cited relevant case laws to support its decision. The judgment was delivered on October 27, 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>