https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414775 A general interim restraint on coercive steps does not, by itself, stay a provisional attachment of property when the attachment order was not specifically challenged. The attachment remains operative unless expressly stayed. The same restraint also does not bar money-laundering investigation or prosecution where no direct challenge to those proceedings is laid, especially when the relied-upon Supreme Court clarification states that a direction against coercive steps is not a stay on investigation or trial. The enforcement action and prosecution may therefore continue in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414775 A general interim restraint on coercive steps does not, by itself, stay a provisional attachment of property when the attachment order was not specifically challenged. The attachment remains operative unless expressly stayed. The same restraint also does not bar money-laundering investigation or prosecution where no direct challenge to those proceedings is laid, especially when the relied-upon Supreme Court clarification states that a direction against coercive steps is not a stay on investigation or trial. The enforcement action and prosecution may therefore continue in accordance with law. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414775