<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 553 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the challenged order. The decision was based on violations of statutory provisions, incorrect service of notices, and lack of opportunity for the appellant to present their case effectively. The appeal was allowed, and the demand proposed in the impugned order was not confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 553 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the challenged order. The decision was based on violations of statutory provisions, incorrect service of notices, and lack of opportunity for the appellant to present their case effectively. The appeal was allowed, and the demand proposed in the impugned order was not confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>