https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414771 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's refund claim of accumulated cenvat credit for most input services, except for Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services. The denial of credit for Advertising Agency Services, Pandal or Shamiana Services, and Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services was deemed unlawful, with only the latter being upheld due to insufficient information. The Tribunal emphasized the nexus between input and output services, overturning the partial denial and holding that the rejection of credit, except for Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services, was unjustified. en-us Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414771 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's refund claim of accumulated cenvat credit for most input services, except for Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services. The denial of credit for Advertising Agency Services, Pandal or Shamiana Services, and Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services was deemed unlawful, with only the latter being upheld due to insufficient information. The Tribunal emphasized the nexus between input and output services, overturning the partial denial and holding that the rejection of credit, except for Real Estate Agent and Consultant Services, was unjustified. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414771