<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 273 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298713</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was held to be unavailable once a Magistrate has issued a fresh non-bailable warrant, and the application was refused as misconceived. The petitioner&#039;s further request to restrain execution of the warrant and to stay its operation until the proposed date of appearance was also declined. The Court therefore refused both the principal relief and the ancillary stay, and dismissed the application in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 273 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298713</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was held to be unavailable once a Magistrate has issued a fresh non-bailable warrant, and the application was refused as misconceived. The petitioner&#039;s further request to restrain execution of the warrant and to stay its operation until the proposed date of appearance was also declined. The Court therefore refused both the principal relief and the ancillary stay, and dismissed the application in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>