https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298711 Certiorari review under Article 226 is limited to jurisdictional error, manifest legal error, or findings unsupported by evidence, and a closure permission under Section 25-O will not be disturbed where the employer proves bona fide industrial unviability. On the record, continuous losses, erosion of net worth, debt burden, non-viability of the units, and rehabilitation proceedings treating the units as closed supported the closure case, while the workmen's allegations of mismanagement remained unsubstantiated. The closure was therefore upheld as commercially justified and consistent with public interest. Workmen who had not opted for VRS were held entitled only to the compensation framework directed in the operative order, not reinstatement or revival of the closed units. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 15:27:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298711 Certiorari review under Article 226 is limited to jurisdictional error, manifest legal error, or findings unsupported by evidence, and a closure permission under Section 25-O will not be disturbed where the employer proves bona fide industrial unviability. On the record, continuous losses, erosion of net worth, debt burden, non-viability of the units, and rehabilitation proceedings treating the units as closed supported the closure case, while the workmen's allegations of mismanagement remained unsubstantiated. The closure was therefore upheld as commercially justified and consistent with public interest. Workmen who had not opted for VRS were held entitled only to the compensation framework directed in the operative order, not reinstatement or revival of the closed units. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298711