<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 549 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414768</link>
    <description>Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits refusal to enforce a foreign award on public policy grounds only where enforcement clearly and manifestly breaches the fundamental policy of Indian law. The provision bars a merits review, preventing enforcement proceedings from becoming an appeal against the arbitral tribunal&#039;s reasoning. Share purchase and exit arrangements may be assessed as spot delivery arrangements under the SCRA where consistent with the statutory and regulatory framework. A commercially sensible interpretation of a put option and a non-resident purchaser arrangement does not necessarily violate FEMA; even an assumed FEMA breach does not by itself make an award unenforceable. Damages for contractual breach may be enforced without directly enforcing the put option.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 549 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414768</link>
      <description>Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits refusal to enforce a foreign award on public policy grounds only where enforcement clearly and manifestly breaches the fundamental policy of Indian law. The provision bars a merits review, preventing enforcement proceedings from becoming an appeal against the arbitral tribunal&#039;s reasoning. Share purchase and exit arrangements may be assessed as spot delivery arrangements under the SCRA where consistent with the statutory and regulatory framework. A commercially sensible interpretation of a put option and a non-resident purchaser arrangement does not necessarily violate FEMA; even an assumed FEMA breach does not by itself make an award unenforceable. Damages for contractual breach may be enforced without directly enforcing the put option.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>