https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414767 Admission of the cheque signature triggered the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the complainant. The accused was required to rebut that presumption by showing a probable defence, but the materials relied on to allege coercion and police-station procurement of the cheque were found insufficient. The Madras HC also found no perversity or gross injustice in the concurrent findings below and declined to reappreciate the evidence in revision. The conviction and sentence under Section 138 were therefore sustained and the revision was rejected. en-us Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:01:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414767 Admission of the cheque signature triggered the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in favour of the complainant. The accused was required to rebut that presumption by showing a probable defence, but the materials relied on to allege coercion and police-station procurement of the cheque were found insufficient. The Madras HC also found no perversity or gross injustice in the concurrent findings below and declined to reappreciate the evidence in revision. The conviction and sentence under Section 138 were therefore sustained and the revision was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414767