<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414757</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, determining it was without jurisdiction. The Court found the petitioner had fully disclosed all material facts, and the Assessing Officer lacked valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment. Thus, reopening the assessment after four years was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414757</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, determining it was without jurisdiction. The Court found the petitioner had fully disclosed all material facts, and the Assessing Officer lacked valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment. Thus, reopening the assessment after four years was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>