<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 533 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 5154/DEL/2016, upholding the quashing of reassessment due to the absence of incriminating material supporting the addition of Rs. 1,99,65,000 to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal affirmed that the jurisdiction assumed under Section 153C was invalid as no satisfaction was recorded, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence for reopening assessments. The reassessment was deemed ab initio void, and the appeal was consequently dismissed on 08.11.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 533 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in ITA No. 5154/DEL/2016, upholding the quashing of reassessment due to the absence of incriminating material supporting the addition of Rs. 1,99,65,000 to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal affirmed that the jurisdiction assumed under Section 153C was invalid as no satisfaction was recorded, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating evidence for reopening assessments. The reassessment was deemed ab initio void, and the appeal was consequently dismissed on 08.11.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>