https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414736 The appellate authority treated remand as necessary where the adjudication order had not addressed the relevant mineral-export notification under Section 11C of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, together with supporting factual material. As the record was inadequate for a final merits determination and no response was received from the adjudicating authority when comments were sought, the matter required fresh examination of the facts, documents and submissions. The order was set aside and the case was remitted for de novo adjudication in accordance with law and natural justice. en-us Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414736 The appellate authority treated remand as necessary where the adjudication order had not addressed the relevant mineral-export notification under Section 11C of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, together with supporting factual material. As the record was inadequate for a final merits determination and no response was received from the adjudicating authority when comments were sought, the matter required fresh examination of the facts, documents and submissions. The order was set aside and the case was remitted for de novo adjudication in accordance with law and natural justice. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414736