https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414735 SEBI's request to vacate the SAT's order was granted by the Supreme Court, staying further proceedings. The attachment notice issued by SEBI aimed to recover funds related to PACL's scheme. DDPL and Unicorn objected to SEBI's actions, citing procedural errors. The Supreme Court affirmed SEBI's authority under Article 142 and appointed Shri R S Virk to evaluate objections. Shri R S Virk's tenure was extended, and various interlocutory applications were allowed based on his assessments. The Court upheld SEBI's attachment order, allowing DDPL and Unicorn to deposit funds in an Escrow account. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:29:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414735 SEBI's request to vacate the SAT's order was granted by the Supreme Court, staying further proceedings. The attachment notice issued by SEBI aimed to recover funds related to PACL's scheme. DDPL and Unicorn objected to SEBI's actions, citing procedural errors. The Supreme Court affirmed SEBI's authority under Article 142 and appointed Shri R S Virk to evaluate objections. Shri R S Virk's tenure was extended, and various interlocutory applications were allowed based on his assessments. The Court upheld SEBI's attachment order, allowing DDPL and Unicorn to deposit funds in an Escrow account. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414735