<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1370 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298686</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the first appellate Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the cheques were issued for time-barred debts and therefore did not constitute legally enforceable debts under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The criminal appeals were dismissed, upholding the judgment that the debts were beyond the limitation period without valid acknowledgment, rendering them time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:20:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1370 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298686</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the first appellate Court&#039;s decision, ruling that the cheques were issued for time-barred debts and therefore did not constitute legally enforceable debts under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The criminal appeals were dismissed, upholding the judgment that the debts were beyond the limitation period without valid acknowledgment, rendering them time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>