<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 887 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298685</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the acquittal order and convicted the first respondent under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The first respondent was sentenced to imprisonment till rising of the court and ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 25,000 to the appellant, with a default sentence of two months&#039; simple imprisonment. The court clarified that even a time-barred debt can be a valid consideration for a cheque issuance, and dishonoring such a cheque constitutes an offense under section 138 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 13:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 887 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298685</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the acquittal order and convicted the first respondent under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The first respondent was sentenced to imprisonment till rising of the court and ordered to pay a compensation of Rs. 25,000 to the appellant, with a default sentence of two months&#039; simple imprisonment. The court clarified that even a time-barred debt can be a valid consideration for a cheque issuance, and dishonoring such a cheque constitutes an offense under section 138 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>