<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414723</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investments and bogus expenditure. The Court emphasized that the findings on pure questions of fact by the Tribunal are not subject to further adjudication under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414723</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO regarding unexplained investments and bogus expenditure. The Court emphasized that the findings on pure questions of fact by the Tribunal are not subject to further adjudication under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>