<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414715</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have valid reasons to assume jurisdiction. The reassessment was based on incorrect information, violating principles of natural justice and constituting a mere change of opinion. The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, highlighting the failure of the AO to properly consider the facts and provide a valid basis for the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:10:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 496 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414715</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not have valid reasons to assume jurisdiction. The reassessment was based on incorrect information, violating principles of natural justice and constituting a mere change of opinion. The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, highlighting the failure of the AO to properly consider the facts and provide a valid basis for the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>