https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414706 Clause 3 of the Master Circular dated 10 February 2012 operated independently of Clause 2 and continued to authorise the Registrar of Companies to withhold approval, registration and recording of company documents, and to keep them from public view, where a management dispute subsisted. The writ challenge was confined to deactivation of the DIN, so relief could validly extend only to that issue. The portion of the earlier order that set aside the separate Clause 3 restraint went beyond the scope of the writ petition and was recalled. The DIN reactivation remained undisturbed, while the document-processing bar based on the management dispute was restored. en-us Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:09:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414706 Clause 3 of the Master Circular dated 10 February 2012 operated independently of Clause 2 and continued to authorise the Registrar of Companies to withhold approval, registration and recording of company documents, and to keep them from public view, where a management dispute subsisted. The writ challenge was confined to deactivation of the DIN, so relief could validly extend only to that issue. The portion of the earlier order that set aside the separate Clause 3 restraint went beyond the scope of the writ petition and was recalled. The DIN reactivation remained undisturbed, while the document-processing bar based on the management dispute was restored. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414706