<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414704</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to dismiss the bank&#039;s stay application, emphasizing the pending NCLT application for vacation of the status quo order. The High Court stressed the need for expeditious resolution by the NCLT and refrained from assessing the case&#039;s merits, directing the NCLT to address the matter promptly without undue delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:09:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 485 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414704</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to dismiss the bank&#039;s stay application, emphasizing the pending NCLT application for vacation of the status quo order. The High Court stressed the need for expeditious resolution by the NCLT and refrained from assessing the case&#039;s merits, directing the NCLT to address the matter promptly without undue delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>