<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414693</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the liquidation order, upholding the decision of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to proceed with liquidation over the Appellant&#039;s settlement plan. The Tribunal emphasized the timely completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the commercial wisdom of the CoC, stating that judicial intervention should only occur in the presence of a legal flaw in the CoC&#039;s decision. The judgment affirmed the legality and fairness of the liquidation order, highlighting the limited scope for judicial interference in CoC&#039;s decisions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414693</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the liquidation order, upholding the decision of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) to proceed with liquidation over the Appellant&#039;s settlement plan. The Tribunal emphasized the timely completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the commercial wisdom of the CoC, stating that judicial intervention should only occur in the presence of a legal flaw in the CoC&#039;s decision. The judgment affirmed the legality and fairness of the liquidation order, highlighting the limited scope for judicial interference in CoC&#039;s decisions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>