<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 43 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27112</link>
    <description>For section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income from house property is taxable according to true ownership, meaning the person who can exercise ownership rights in his own right. Although the land stood in the assessee&#039;s name, evidence showed that the superstructure of Park View Hotel was constructed with equal contributions from the assessee and his two brothers. The absence of a registered conveyance did not prevent recognition of factual ownership of the building, and section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act could not establish title without a written agreement. The assessee was therefore not the sole owner; the superstructure was jointly owned in one-third shares, and only his share of the income was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 43 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27112</link>
      <description>For section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income from house property is taxable according to true ownership, meaning the person who can exercise ownership rights in his own right. Although the land stood in the assessee&#039;s name, evidence showed that the superstructure of Park View Hotel was constructed with equal contributions from the assessee and his two brothers. The absence of a registered conveyance did not prevent recognition of factual ownership of the building, and section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act could not establish title without a written agreement. The assessee was therefore not the sole owner; the superstructure was jointly owned in one-third shares, and only his share of the income was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>