https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414667 The appellate court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding him guilty for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court dismissed the revision petition challenging the conviction and the order for compensation and default imprisonment, as the accused failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. Additionally, the court found the sentence imposed on the accused to be appropriate and declined to reduce it, affirming the original order in its entirety. en-us Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Nov 2021 18:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414667 The appellate court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding him guilty for issuing a dishonored cheque. The court dismissed the revision petition challenging the conviction and the order for compensation and default imprisonment, as the accused failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claims. Additionally, the court found the sentence imposed on the accused to be appropriate and declined to reduce it, affirming the original order in its entirety. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414667