<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414661</link>
    <description>Compliance with the 20% deposit condition imposed while suspending sentence in the pending appeal removed the live controversy over the earlier refusal of bail. As the petitioner had already been enlarged on bail on that basis and the criminal appeal remained pending, the revision no longer required adjudication on merits. The Gujarat High Court therefore treated the revision application as infructuous and disposed of it, leaving the pending appeal to be decided independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 442 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414661</link>
      <description>Compliance with the 20% deposit condition imposed while suspending sentence in the pending appeal removed the live controversy over the earlier refusal of bail. As the petitioner had already been enlarged on bail on that basis and the criminal appeal remained pending, the revision no longer required adjudication on merits. The Gujarat High Court therefore treated the revision application as infructuous and disposed of it, leaving the pending appeal to be decided independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>