https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298675 An appellate authority's rejection of an appeal without considering a request for retesting of the third sample under clause 32A(2) of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and without recording reasons, was held unsustainable. A quasi-judicial order affecting civil consequences must show application of mind and be a speaking order; a reasonless order cannot stand. The non-speaking appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after considering the retesting request and granting an opportunity of hearing. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:45:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298675 An appellate authority's rejection of an appeal without considering a request for retesting of the third sample under clause 32A(2) of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985, and without recording reasons, was held unsustainable. A quasi-judicial order affecting civil consequences must show application of mind and be a speaking order; a reasonless order cannot stand. The non-speaking appellate order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after considering the retesting request and granting an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298675