<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298671</link>
    <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is an indefeasible right once the statutory conditions are met, and it cannot be made illusory by an onerous monetary condition unrelated to bail. The Madras HC held that requiring deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs as a condition for default bail was impermissible because it effectively defeated the statutory right. The court deleted the condition and allowed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298671</link>
      <description>Default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is an indefeasible right once the statutory conditions are met, and it cannot be made illusory by an onerous monetary condition unrelated to bail. The Madras HC held that requiring deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs as a condition for default bail was impermissible because it effectively defeated the statutory right. The court deleted the condition and allowed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>