https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298670 Delhi HC declined to interfere with a reasoned order granting regular bail, holding that cancellation was unwarranted where custodial interrogation was no longer required, the accused had remained in custody for more than a month, and the trial was likely to take time. The Court also noted that the trial court had considered the nature of the allegations, the largely bailable character of the offences, the complainant's medical position, and had imposed stringent conditions to address concerns of intimidation and evidence tampering. No ground was made out to upset the bail order, and the petition failed. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Nov 2021 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298670 Delhi HC declined to interfere with a reasoned order granting regular bail, holding that cancellation was unwarranted where custodial interrogation was no longer required, the accused had remained in custody for more than a month, and the trial was likely to take time. The Court also noted that the trial court had considered the nature of the allegations, the largely bailable character of the offences, the complainant's medical position, and had imposed stringent conditions to address concerns of intimidation and evidence tampering. No ground was made out to upset the bail order, and the petition failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298670