<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 435 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414654</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires objective material with a rational nexus to a belief that turnover has escaped assessment; mere suspicion, conjecture, or dissatisfaction with the original assessment is insufficient, so proceedings initiated without adverse material against the dealer&#039;s documents were invalid. Tax on Bitumen could not be sustained where the dealer produced an application, affidavit, and certificate showing PWD supply for road work, and the record contained no contrary material rebutting that explanation. The reassessment and the Bitumen levy were therefore set aside, and the assessee obtained relief with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:30:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 435 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414654</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act requires objective material with a rational nexus to a belief that turnover has escaped assessment; mere suspicion, conjecture, or dissatisfaction with the original assessment is insufficient, so proceedings initiated without adverse material against the dealer&#039;s documents were invalid. Tax on Bitumen could not be sustained where the dealer produced an application, affidavit, and certificate showing PWD supply for road work, and the record contained no contrary material rebutting that explanation. The reassessment and the Bitumen levy were therefore set aside, and the assessee obtained relief with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>