<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414650</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to an amalgamated entity that had already ceased to exist was treated as jurisdictionally defective because the proceeding must be initiated against an existing assessee. The defect was held not curable under Section 292B, since issuing notice to a non-existent entity was not a mere technical or clerical error in an otherwise valid proceeding. The result was that the notice was invalid and the reassessment challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 431 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414650</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to an amalgamated entity that had already ceased to exist was treated as jurisdictionally defective because the proceeding must be initiated against an existing assessee. The defect was held not curable under Section 292B, since issuing notice to a non-existent entity was not a mere technical or clerical error in an otherwise valid proceeding. The result was that the notice was invalid and the reassessment challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>